Insultes, menaces, mégaphone… : elle surprend une élève nue avec son mari enseignant, ses belles-sœurs portent le combat
In an effort to clear the name of their brother, Mansour F., three sisters found themselves at the center of an adultery case that ended up before the Pikine-Guédiawaye flagrante delicto court. With one of them, Nabou, on the run, it was the other two, Seynabou and Marème, who responded last Friday to the charges of violence and assault, threats, and public insults, filed in a complaint by Ibrahima D., father of Ndèye Rokhaya D. and husband of Maty N., the alleged victims of the charges.
The case began last April. According to the account of L'Observateur, which attended the trial, a teacher's wife surprised Ndèye Rokhaya D., a high school senior, in the marital bedroom. Found naked, according to the daily newspaper, she allegedly tried to hide in the bathroom. In vain. In tears, the cuckolded wife complained to her sisters-in-law, Seynabou, Marème, and Nabou.
The latter then decided to settle the matter their own way, by force. "On April 15," rewinds L'Observateur, "while returning from school, Rokhaya D. was accosted in front of her home. According to her statements, she was called a 'prostitute', a 'husband-eater' and threatened by her lover's sisters, armed with sharp objects. Her torn blouse was even placed under seal by the police."
Rokhaya D.'s mother, Maty N., tried to intervene, but was insulted and in turn called a prostitute, according to the daily newspaper of the Future Media Group, which quoted her testimony from the court. "Three days later, things escalated," the newspaper recalled. "Seynabou rented a megaphone to give the humiliations a public and popular feel. In front of the neighborhood residents, mother and daughter were accused of receiving men into their homes and leading a dissolute lifestyle."
"They destroyed our reputation throughout the neighborhood," Maty N. denounced in court, as reported by L'Observateur.
The defendants denied the charges. The newspaper reports that Seynabou simply admitted to insulting her brother's lover, considering his actions a reaction to the "humiliation" she suffered, while Marème appeared to legitimize the assault by claiming "provocation." "Both denied using the megaphone, despite testimony to the contrary," the same source reports. The source concludes that the prosecutor, considering the facts consistent, requested the application of the law, and that the court acquitted the two sisters of the charges of violence and threats, "due to insufficient evidence," before sentencing them to six months suspended sentences for public insults.
Commentaires (5)
Megaphone hahaa
Chambre conjugale ?!!! Il n'y a pas pire idiot que cet enseignant. Elles méritaient, pour l'exemple, 3 mois fermes.
Dans ce pays la presse tient le haut du pavé avec les histoires de fesses, de cocufiage , pas d'autres sujets brûlants comme la pénurie d'eau, d'électricité, ravages des cultures par les inondations ? les vrais sujets ne manquent pas mais n'intéressent pas nos scribouilleurs appelés pompeusement journalistes.
PAs que la Presse , les histoires de fesses cela va jusqu'au sommet de l"etat et les sénégalais le veulent bien. Désolé mais c'est à vous de vous adapter aux "nouvelles " moeurs de ce pays.
Elles auraient aussi dû attaquer leur frère irresponsable. Des sanctions disciplinaires doivent aussi etre prises. Djangalal haler ham ham nakay diangal thiay thiay
L adultère est inacceptable,pour les personnes imbues d un minimum de moralité et d éthique.
Pour les autres qui le trouvent normal,doivent se marier entre eux,et faire ces sauvageries entre eux.
Je surprend des adulerins,je les massacre et je l assume devant la cour d assise ,les magistrats professionnels et les jurés.
Adultère,je tue.point final
Participer à la Discussion